Ranked by ORI Score — an Elo-style rating computed from every graded gravel race in the database, weighted by how much that race counts. Full methodology below.
Every race is a chance to prove how you stack up — not just against whoever else showed up that day, but against the entire sport. A rider who wins their age group at a small local race and a rider who wins their age group at Unbound accomplished very different things. Counting wins or podiums can’t tell them apart. The ORI Score can, because it accounts for exactly who you raced and how much that race counts for.
Chess players have used Elo since 1960 to rate players who never all play each other, using only the games that actually happened. We apply the same math to racing. Every rider starts a ranking period at a baseline of 1000. Then, in chronological order, we replay that period’s races. For each finisher, we compare them — one at a time — against everyone else in their comparison field:
That’s the probability, given current scores, that you’d beat that specific rival. Average it across the whole field and you get your expected result for that race — essentially, what your rating predicted you’d finish. Then we look at what actually happened:
1st of 50 scores a perfect 1.00; last place scores 0.00. Your rating then moves by:
Beat your prediction and your score climbs; underperform it — even finishing near the front of a field your rating predicted you’d win — and it drops. K is a flat 32 for every race. The field-size factor discounts tiny fields — a 2-person race moves your score far less than a 50-person field would — so an empty parking lot doesn’t count the same as a real championship. The race weight is the ORI Grade below.
Every graded race carries an ORI Grade — HC, 1, 2, or 3 — reflecting its depth of field and standing in the sport. A strong result at an HC race moves your score more than the identical result at a Grade 3 race would.
Current is a rolling window covering your last twelve months of racing — it updates continuously and always reflects recent form. Calendar Year rankings lock in once a year is fully over, as a permanent record of how that season played out. Every rider starts both kinds of period at the 1000 baseline — a Calendar Year ranking is a clean, independent snapshot, not a continuation of the year before, and the Current window resets the same way as it rolls forward.
You need at least 5 results in a division within a period to be ranked at all — enough races to say something real about where you stand. Once you clear that bar, only your 5 best results (the ones that moved your score up the most) count toward your final score for that period; the race count shown next to your score is your full qualifying total, not just those 5.
For an Eliteresult, you’re scored on your place within the Elite/Pro field itself. For an Amateuror Open result, you’re scored on your place across the entire gender field for that race — Elite, Amateur, and Open riders combined — since that’s the truest measure of who you actually beat. A race with no Elite/Pro category at all counts as Open, and Open results count toward bothan Elite and an Amateur ranking: a rider with a mix of Elite, Amateur, and Open results in a period can hold both rankings simultaneously. Within Amateur, you’re shown against your own age bracket — assigned once per period, based on your age as of that period, not race by race.
A “field strength” number never needs to be computed separately — it’s built into the rating of everyone else on the start line. Beat a field of previously-unrated riders and your score barely moves. Beat a field that includes riders who’ve already proven themselves against Elite fields elsewhere, and it moves a lot. This is also how an amateur racing in an Open category at a small race that happens to include a pro or two gets full credit for it — the pro’s rating (built from their Elite results elsewhere) raises that specific field’s difficulty, which raises what the amateur earns for finishing near them.
Elites race the same small pool of people repeatedly across a period, so their ratings converge quickly and reliably. Amateurs in the same age bracket might only cross paths once or twice a year — a score built on 5 races is a lot less certain than one built on 20. Read a fast-rising score with a low race count as promising, not proven.